Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test

Steve Simon


This page is currently being updated from the earlier version of my website. Sorry that it is not yet fully available.

Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Osborne, Jason & Elaine Waters (2002). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(2). Retrieved October 20, 2008 from Excerpt: Most statistical tests rely upon certain assumptions about the variables used in the analysis. When these assumptions are not met the results may not be trustworthy, resulting in a Type I or Type II error, or over- or under-estimation of significance or effect size(s). As Pedhazur (1997, p. 33) notes, “Knowledge and understanding of the situations when violations of assumptions lead to serious biases, and when they are of little consequence, are essential to meaningful data analysis”. However, as Osborne, Christensen, and Gunter (2001) observe, few articles report having tested assumptions of the statistical tests they rely on for drawing their conclusions. This creates a situation where we have a rich literature in education and social science, but we are forced to call into question the validity of many of these results, conclusions, and assertions, as we have no idea whether the assumptions of the statistical tests were met. Our goal for this paper is to present a discussion of the assumptions of multiple regression tailored toward the practicing researcher.

You can find an earlier version of this page on my original website.